Respect The Box

Swear to God, I’ll write him in if I have to……….

Is bias in the MSM so pervasive now that they not only show bias to the D’s, but they are now comfortable revealing their primary picks?
See if you can pick up the subtle bias in Hillary’s favor here:

By last night, senior aides to Clinton, who represents New York, and Obama, the junior senator from Illinois, were quarreling on television, their raised voices a measure of how competitive the 2008 presidential campaign has become with more than six months until the first votes are cast.

Catch that? Clinton represents New York, while Obama is just the “junior” senator from Illinois. Why doesn’t it say, “Clinton, the junior Senator from New York, and Obama, who represents Illinois……”? Only the “journalist” who wrote the article knows for sure.

The Hotline blog highlights this exhange between Barack Obama and George Stephanopolous:

STEPHANOPOULOS: You’ve also said that with Social Security, everything should be on the table.
OBAMA: Yes.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Raising the retirement age?
OBAMA: Everything should be on the table.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Raising payroll taxes?
OBAMA: Everything should be on the table. I think we should
approach it the same way Tip O’Neill and Ronald Reagan did back in
1983. They came together. I don’t want to lay out my preferences
beforehand, but what I know is that Social Security is solvable. It
is not as difficult a problem as we’re going to have with Medicaid and
Medicare.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Partial privatization?
OBAMA: Privatization is not something that I would consider….

So everything should be on the table except the stuff that I don’t want to be on the table. Idiot. Why is this lightweight even being humored with support in the polls?

Can we dispense with the “Charlie-Weis-is-a-genius” talk? Forever?
Thanks so much.

Well, this being January 2 and all, let’s expand that to say, best headline of this college football season:

Wolverines go down with a whimper
Rout by USC exposes Michigan as pretenders in national title picture

Amen, brother, amen!

Carr was asked whether USC could beat Ohio State. Who better to ask than the coach who had lost his last two games to them both?
Carr, though, wasn’t biting.
“I’ll let you be the judge,” he said.

That’s just Carr’s way of saying, “There’s no real way to tell, because we got way lucky to be able to score as many points as we did against Ohio State. If we had played them again, the result would probably have been the same as the USC game.”

How many times does OSU have to beat them for people to get that they can’t beat us?
Why would you want a rematch of a game that was just played? An OSU/UM rematch is completely different than, say, an OSU/UT rematch, or God forbid, a UM/Notre Dame rematch. Each team is a different team than they were in September. Thus a rematch would be an interesting test of each team’s improvements and exposed deficiencies that perhaps weren’t obvious in September.
On the other hand, OSU just beat Michigan. We’re both the teams we’ll be on January 8. So what’s the point?
And I am tired of the argument that Michigan deserves more respect than Florida because they came within 3 points of the #1 team on their home field? Don’t kid yourself. If we had played Michigan again, they wouldn’t have come within two touchdowns. Face it: We handed them 10 points on a silver platter. Our first turnover game them the ball on what? Our 25? Anyone recall how many yards they gained on that series? Anyone familiar with the expression “3 yards and a cloud of dust?” Well, there was no dust. Just the 3 yards. The best the “second best team in the country” could muster on that drive starting at our 25 was three points, or put another way, 1 point per yard. They scored again when we coughed the ball up on the 9 yard line. So for those 10 points, they had to gain a whole 12 yards. If we play them again, they don’t score those 10 points. Suddenly, their 3 point loss is a 13 point loss in a gaime they were never really in. I think it was Pat Forde on ESPN.com that pointed out that for all Michigan’s heroics, they only had one opportunity to take the lead in the second half, (it was 31-35) and they went three and out. We promptly drove the length of the field for a touchdown. Game over.
Bring on the Gators. Michigan showed a complete inability to stop us. No doubt the Gators effort will be just as futile. Then can everyone shut up about the SEC being the best conference in the nation?